Executives at TriState Integrated Services attributed a round of recent staff reductions to what they described as “challenging market conditions,” a phrase company leadership repeated frequently this week while declining to elaborate on which conditions, specifically, were responsible.

The layoffs, which affected at least 14 employees across multiple departments, were carried out over the course of several days and largely targeted staff members who had raised questions about the company’s financial outlook, leadership decisions, or long-term strategy, according to current and former employees.

In a statement provided to Buck County Bull Crapper, TriState said the decision was “difficult but necessary” and emphasized that the company remains “committed to transparency, accountability, and open dialogue.”

Former employees say the dialogue ended abruptly.

A Familiar Explanation

The layoffs began quietly last Thursday morning, when several employees were called into brief one-on-one meetings with human resources and informed their positions had been eliminated, effective immediately.

Those affected were told the company was responding to “external pressures” and “market volatility.”

“It was very vague,” said one former employee who worked in operations and requested anonymity due to a severance agreement. “They kept saying ‘market conditions’ like it explained everything.”

The employee said no data or metrics were presented during the meeting.

“I asked what had changed in the market,” they said. “That’s when things got uncomfortable.”

According to multiple accounts, employees who asked follow-up questions during or after the meetings were among those let go.

Questions Become Liabilities

Several current employees said concerns had been circulating internally for weeks before the layoffs, including questions about stalled projects, delayed payments from clients, and the company’s recent decision to invest heavily in what leadership described as “brand-forward initiatives.”

“We were told to trust the strategy,” said one employee. “But nobody could articulate what the strategy was.”

Another employee said that staff meetings had increasingly emphasized positivity and alignment, while discouraging what leadership called “counterproductive speculation.”

“There was a slide about ‘energy management,’” the employee recalled. “Basically, don’t bring negative energy into meetings.”

Employees say those who continued to press for clarity were viewed as “not aligned.”

Leadership Stays on Message

In an interview, TriState CEO Brian Caldwell said the layoffs were not connected to internal questioning, but rather to broader economic forces.

“The market is unpredictable right now,” Caldwell said. “We have to make proactive decisions to ensure long-term stability.”

When asked what specific market indicators informed the layoffs, Caldwell said the company monitors a range of factors.

“We’re looking at trends,” he said. “We’re looking at signals.”

Pressed on whether revenue had declined, Caldwell said the company remained “financially healthy.”

When asked why financially healthy companies conduct layoffs, Caldwell said health should be understood “holistically.”

“It’s about resilience,” he said.

A Culture of Caution

Employees describe an internal culture where raising concerns gradually became risky.

“At first it was encouraged,” said a former project manager. “They said they wanted feedback.”

Over time, that encouragement appeared to narrow.

“You could ask questions,” the manager said. “You just had to ask the right ones.”

Several employees said meetings increasingly focused on reaffirming leadership decisions rather than examining them.

“There was a lot of language about trust,” said one employee. “Trust in leadership. Trust in the process.”

That trust, employees say, was not reciprocated.

The Layoff Pattern

According to internal documents reviewed by Buck County Bull Crapper, the layoffs disproportionately affected employees who had either submitted questions in writing during town halls or raised concerns during departmental meetings.

Among those let go were:

• a senior analyst who questioned declining client renewals
• a marketing coordinator who asked why budgets were being shifted away from core services
• a customer support lead who raised concerns about staffing levels

One employee who survived the layoffs said the pattern was hard to ignore.

“It felt like the people who noticed things were the ones who disappeared,” they said.

Clients Left Guessing

Several TriState clients said they were not informed of the layoffs until after they occurred, despite working closely with affected employees.

“One day my contact just stopped responding,” said a regional client. “Then someone else emailed me and said they’d be taking over.”

The email cited “organizational changes.”

“I asked if everything was okay,” the client said. “They said yes. Then they mentioned market conditions.”

Another client said the explanation felt rehearsed.

“It’s like everyone got the same talking points,” the client said.

Experts See a Trend

Business analysts say TriState’s explanation reflects a broader trend in corporate communication.

“‘Market conditions’ has become a catch-all justification,” said Dr. Helen Ramirez, a labor economist. “It’s vague enough to deflect scrutiny and familiar enough to discourage follow-up.”

Ramirez said the phrase is often deployed strategically.

“It signals inevitability,” she said. “As if no one is responsible.”

Asked whether layoffs can be used to manage dissent, Ramirez said it happens more often than companies admit.

“Organizations tend to equate questioning with risk,” she said. “Especially during periods of uncertainty.”

Inside the Office After the Cuts

Following the layoffs, remaining employees describe a quieter office.

Empty desks remain unclaimed. Team calendars show meetings that no longer occur. Slack channels have gone silent.

“There’s a lot of careful phrasing now,” said one employee. “People choose their words.”

Another said the layoffs had changed how staff interact with leadership.

“You don’t want to be seen as difficult,” they said. “Or curious.”

Company leadership, meanwhile, has encouraged employees to “stay focused on what they can control.”

HR Emphasizes Positivity

In a memo sent to staff Friday afternoon, TriState’s HR department acknowledged the layoffs and encouraged employees to “move forward together.”

The memo emphasized gratitude, resilience, and adaptability.

“We understand this may be unsettling,” it read. “But these decisions were made with the future in mind.”

Employees were reminded of available wellness resources.

“It felt strange,” said one employee. “Like, we just lost coworkers, and now we’re being told to meditate.”

Accountability Deferred

When asked whether TriState leadership planned to take responsibility for any strategic missteps that may have contributed to the layoffs, Caldwell said the company was focused on solutions, not blame.

“Looking backward doesn’t help us move forward,” he said.

He reiterated that the layoffs were unrelated to internal feedback.

“We value diverse perspectives,” Caldwell said. “We just have to balance that with execution.”

Asked whether employees would be encouraged to ask questions in the future, Caldwell said communication channels remain open.

“We’re always open to dialogue,” he said.

Employees Read the Message

Despite assurances, employees say the message was clear.

“Questions are fine,” said one employee. “Until they’re not.”

Another put it more simply.

“Market conditions,” they said. “That’s what happens when you notice too much.”

---

Editor’s Note

TriState Integrated Services did not provide specific data supporting its claims of market volatility. Requests for clarification regarding internal feedback policies were not answered before publication.